About this deal
OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION COURT Mr Justice Stuart-Smith [2020] EWHC 2211 (TCC) Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Graham Dunning QC, Mr Stuart Cribb and Mr Wei Jian Chan (instructed by Rosenblatt Ltd)......
No hearings. 8. Insolvency & Companies Court List (Chancery Division) 8.1 Remote hearings before a High Court Judge Zimmermann, M. B. & Kohrle, J. The impact of iron and selenium deficiencies on iodine and thyroid metabolism: Biochemistry and relevance to public health. Thyroid 12, 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1089/105072502761016494 (2002).
The Supreme Court unanimously allows the appeal, holding that the ‘reasonable tolerability’ test applied by the Court of Appeal is contrary to the Convention and should not be followed in the future. HJ and HT’s cases are remitted for reconsideration in light of the detailed guidance provided by the Supreme Court.
Zaletel, K., Gaberscek, S. & Pirnat, E. Ten-year follow-up of thyroid epidemiology in Slovenia after increase in salt iodization. Croat. Med. J. 52, 615–621. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2011.52.615 (2011). Linear regression analysis between weekly intake of 22 food groups and HT-related phenotypes detected a significant positive association between plant oil consumption and T3 levels in the group including all HT patients (β = 0.07, p< 0.0001) and in the sub-group of HT patients that were on LT4 therapy (β = 0.10, p = 0.001). We also found a negative association between the consumption of olive oil and systolic blood pressure in the sub-group of HT patients that were taking LT4 therapy (β = − 0.16, p = 0.001). All other close-to-significant observations are reported in SI Table S6.Zhang, X. et al. A high-fat diet rich in saturated and mono-unsaturated fatty acids induces disturbance of thyroid lipid profile and hypothyroxinemia in male rats. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 62, e1700599–e1700599. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201700599 (2018). r.19.6, Stuart-Smith J rejected that submission and ruled that the 2017 action was not and could not be a representative action ( [2020] EWHC 2211 (TCC)). That decision was recently upheld by this court ( [2021] EWCA 1389). That means that the 2017 action now involves just two claims, thos......
